Runtime fingerprintToken readout from the active provider chain.
Live DS
Runtime
PlatformRottay
Rottay / ModernPlatform Flagship
Primary
#FFFFFFSecondary #A0A0A5
Radius
Compact runtime evidence across 3+ token signals.
Published DS package ยท Tenant Showcase ยท Rottay / modernShared route metadata for the active runtime, kept inline so the shell reads like a thin header band.
Palette
#FFFFFFRottay
Chrome
Modernrenderer posture
Radius
14pxsurface shape
Density
normalPlatform Flagship
Back to BitHire
Interviews3 scenario rowsTier mix 0P / 0S / 15Pr
Scenario summary
Interviews in BitHire is built for speed, visibility, and decision support.
Interview tooling turns subjective conversations into structured, comparable signal without slowing teams down. These scenarios stay BitHire-specific in workflow and copy, but the live visuals should still come from the active docs runtime instead of a local preset.
Scenario rows3Named modules that anchor this category's product story.
Unique parts11Distinct structures, patterns, and primitives in this category.
Dominant archetypeProcess workspaceThe prevailing interaction shape across these modules.
Scenario rows
Scenario modules
Each row below captures a product-grade module, the component spread behind it, and what to scrutinize when the runtime changes.
Read orderStart with the title and archetype, then inspect composition balance and the part sample.
Proof checkConfirm the lane still reads like one product module after the runtime changes tone, density, and contrast.
01
Scenario module
Interview Calendar
Weekly calendar view with interview slots, availability, and conflict detection.
Composition balancePrimitive-heavy assemblyA quick read on which layer is carrying most of the scenario weight.
Tier mix0P / 0S / 5Pr
Inspect forCheck whether sequence, progress cues, and handoff points remain easy to follow.
Supporting partsRepresentative pieces behind this scenario lane.
Calendar
Card
Badge
Tooltip
+1 more
02
Scenario module
Scorecard Builder
Structured interview scorecard with rating criteria and weighted scoring.
Composition balancePrimitive-heavy assemblyA quick read on which layer is carrying most of the scenario weight.
Tier mix0P / 0S / 5Pr
Inspect forCheck whether grouping, spacing, and field hierarchy still feel calm when the runtime changes.
Supporting partsRepresentative pieces behind this scenario lane.
FormBuilder
Rate
Slider
Textarea
+1 more
03
Scenario module
Feedback Summary
Consolidated interview feedback with interviewer scores and decision recommendations.
Composition balancePrimitive-heavy assemblyA quick read on which layer is carrying most of the scenario weight.
Tier mix0P / 0S / 5Pr
Inspect forCheck whether chart emphasis, contrast, and labels stay legible under the active provider.
Supporting partsRepresentative pieces behind this scenario lane.
Recruiting-focused adaptations of the shared design system.
Runtime controls
TenantRottay
EngineModern
Operators
InterviewersRecruitersHiring managers
The category has to stay legible for these roles even when a different tenant runtime shifts density or contrast.
Tempo and pressureStructured evaluation checkpointsUse the scenario rows below to verify that hierarchy and control placement still hold up at this pace.
Design principles3 guardrails
Principle 01Capture evidence close to the moment.
Principle 02Keep criteria legible and weighted.
Principle 03Make feedback easy to consolidate.
Active provider
Runtime audit
Rottay is rendering this appendix.
Use this page as a reference sheet: the scenario modules stay constant, while contrast, shell tone, and component personality respond to the active docs runtime.
Runtime
PlatformRottay
Rottay / ModernPlatform Flagship
Primary
#FFFFFFSecondary #A0A0A5
Radius
Compact runtime evidence across 3+ token signals.
14pxxl 18px
Density
normalBorder-light cards
Accent
Badge
roundedtop bar ยท solid dividers
Motion
springHover lift 2px
Keep stableInterviews still needs to feel native for Interviewers, Recruiters, and 1 more even while the provider changes the surrounding chrome.
Stress pointStructured evaluation checkpoints means hierarchy, action placement, and contrast cannot become ambiguous under a different runtime.
Read as one laneProcess workspace should feel like one coherent chapter here rather than a stack of isolated component demos.